Will Jensen Huang testify in front of Congress before Jul 2027?: Before Jul 2027

Payout criteria
For the purposes of this Contract, "testified" means that Jensen Huang appeared before Congress (in-person, remotely, or virtually), was sworn in or affirmed, or otherwise appeared in an official proceeding where testimony was compelled or authorized by the committee, and provided substantive answers to questions regarding the subject matter of the hearing. Prepared or opening statements delivered by Jensen Huang or by Jensen Huang's legal counsel do not, by themselves, constitute testimony for purposes of this Contract, even if they address the subject matter of the hearing. Statements made by Jensen Huang's attorney or legal representative during the proceeding are not testimony by Jensen Huang. 
If Jensen Huang provides at least one substantive answer to a question about the hearing's subject matter — even if Jensen Huang invokes the Fifth Amendment or another privilege in response to all other questions — the Contract resolves "Yes."

The following ARE encompassed by the Payout Criterion:
In-person, remote, and/or virtual testimony during an official hearing of the House or Senate (including committees, subcommittees, and joint committees).

Depositions conducted under congressional authority.
Testifying in a closed-door or classified session.
Testimony where Jensen Huang answers substantive questions about the hearing's subject matter, even if responses are limited, evasive, or claim lack of knowledge (e.g., "I don't recall," "I cannot comment on that").
If Jensen Huang appears for a transcribed interview, deposition, or hearing that is not conducted under oath but is officially authorized by the committee and conducted under penalty of making false statements to Congress (18 U.S.C. § 1001), such appearance qualifies for purposes of this Contract, provided Jensen Huang provides at least one substantive answer to a substantive question about the hearing's subject matter.

The following ARE NOT encompassed by the Payout Criterion:
Appearing before Congress but exclusively invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination (or any other constitutional or legal privilege) without providing substantive answers to questions about the subject matter.
Appearing and responding only to procedural or administrative questions without addressing substantive questions about the hearing's subject matter.
Submitting written testimony without appearing live (in-person, remotely, or virtually).
Declining to appear or refusing a congressional subpoena without physically or virtually appearing before the committee.
Doesn't count for payout: Statements made outside of an official committee hearing, deposition, or transcribed interview, such as informal staff-level conversations, proffer sessions with executive branch officials, media 19 words